GO
HR 0.6 vs SoC
95.6% prospective accuracy (company-reported)
Illustrative modeled verdict: moderately superior to standard of care
Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof

Quantified clinical effect size vs standard of care.
BVCT makes your R&D clinically derisked before every GO/NO-GO decision.

BeatSoC Virtual Clinical Trial (BVCT) models Hazard Ratio (HR), Odds Ratio (OR) or Relative Ratio (RR) against standard of care at 0.1 precision (effect sizes reported to one decimal place), at every step from target ID through label expansion. Company-reported prospective accuracy: 95.6% (n=705, cohort 24 Sep 2026). Research use only.

HIPAA-compliant architecture · AES-256 encryption · Proprietary patient records not required · Research use only

Start Free Access Now

BeatSoC at every decision step.

Each pipeline gate answers one question with a modeled BeatSoC estimate: HR, OR or RR vs standard of care, at 0.1 precision.

Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof

From me-better design to deal-grade BIC verdict in 7 days.

Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof
1

Define desired enhancements

Define desired enhancements: choose a reference drug and your target enhancements (e.g. stronger effect size, longer half-life, better oral bioavailability, higher CNS penetrability, fewer adverse effects). Every submission is timestamped.

What's your me-better design?
2

Run H2H Phase 3 Virtual Trials

Translate differential drug designs into modeled effect-size differences in disease-matched virtual patients. Compare variants against the reference drug at 0.1 precision, with mechanistic rationales.

Shall your differential design clinically prevail?
3

Ex-Ante GO/NO-GO Decisions

Estimate HR/OR/RR against a named comparator. Company-reported, timestamp-audited prospective track record: PPV 234/261 (89.7%) and NPV 440/444 (99.1%), cohort 24 Sep 2026. See the evidence page for the cohort and how to check each prediction.

Is the modeled benefit large enough to justify Phase III?
Design clinically me-better drugs in
Run a Blinded Pilot: Submit 3–5 internal design variants of your assets. We run head-to-head Phase 3 BVCTs and report modeled HR/OR/RR against your named comparators, with audit trails. You compare our estimates with your internal data.

From FIC hypothesis to BeatSoC verdict in 7 days.

Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof
1

Define your hypothesis

Select disease and target or drug in the 3D knowledge graph. Regulate nodes to encode your mechanism of action.

What are you testing?
2

Run virtual trial

BVCT auto-fetches eligibility criteria from ClinicalTrials.gov, generates a protocol PDF, and simulates drug-body interactions.

Against what benchmark?
3

Read your verdict

A modeled GO or NO-GO with hazard ratio, odds ratio or relative risk vs standard of care, at 0.1 precision, backed by a company-reported prospective accuracy of 95.6%.

By how much does it beat SoC?

Different research tools answer different questions.
BVCT tells you BY HOW MUCH.

What others deliver
What BVCT delivers
Binding affinity
Kd = 2.3 nM
"Target looks promising in vitro"
Hazard Ratio (HR) vs SoC
Will this target beat Standard of Care in patients, not just in a binding assay
Optimized protocol
n = 400 patients
"Trial design is statistically powered"
Odds Ratio (OR) vs SoC
at 0.1 precision — a modeled estimate of whether this design can show a signal against standard of care
Literature review
10 papers summarized
"Relevant evidence identified"
Relative Ratio (RR) vs SoC
95.6% company-reported prospective accuracy — a modeled comparison with supporting literature
Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof

The six unique values of BVCT.

Every BeatSoC Virtual Clinical Trial delivers six properties no other platform combines.

D E C I D E

Drug-design-based · Effect-size-quantified · Causal-biology-driven · Independent-of-patient-data · Decision-ready · Exact-SoC-controlled

D

Drug-design-based

No patient data required. Predictions start from the drug's design and mechanism of action, applied to the disease, comparator and trial protocol with public scientific knowledge.

E

Effect-size-quantified

HR, ORR, PFS and OS estimates at 0.1 precision: quantitative outputs for decision committees, with their assumptions stated.

C

Causal-biology-driven

Root-cause mechanistic modeling of drug-body interactions. Explainable rationale, not black-box probability.

I

Patient-data-free

Proprietary patient records are not required. De novo virtual patients contain no personal data.

D

Decision-ready

Pre-GO/NO-GO verdicts with commercial framing. Effect sizes your committee can act on at every pipeline gate.

E

Exact SoC-controlled

Head-to-head comparison vs. any Standard of Care. Not standalone prediction — always relative to the benchmark that matters.

Why pharma can bet on this.

95.6%

Prospective track record. 705 scored readouts from 692 predictions of then-ongoing trials, each prediction timestamp-audited to predate its readout (PandaDoc e-signature audit trail).

0.1

0.1 precision on HR/OR/RR. Effect sizes reported to one decimal place (e.g. an illustrative HR 0.6), rather than qualitative labels.

HIPAA

HIPAA-compliant architecture. AES-256-GCM encryption. Hash-chained audit log. Argon2id hashing. Re-auth on reload.

Yours

Your data stays yours. No model fine-tuning on your pipeline data. On-prem available.

Skeptical? Dive into timestamp-audited,
large-scale ex-ante proof

BVCT outputs are modelled decision-support estimates for drug R&D / asset decisions, validated against a prospective ex-ante track record (data.bioinvestgpt.com) — Research Use Only; not clinical advice, not for individual-patient diagnosis or treatment, and not a treatment recommendation.